KCLUG April 2005

53 participants
144 discussions

Not an April Fool
by Jonathan Hutchins 01 Apr '05

01 Apr '05

Wow - this is the first time I've seen a statistic like this in the year or so I've been paying attention: Number of spams : 302 ( 46.04%) Number of clean messages: 354 ( 53.96%) That's more REAL mail than SPAM!

1 0

RE: Good Starter Language? (was Re: REALBasic and OpenAL)
by Jeremy Fowler 01 Apr '05

01 Apr '05

> I liked Pascal but what do you do with it? Measure pressure... What the #$@% do you think you do with it!?! Delphi 2005 kicks major ass. Nuff said. > Perl seems to be very easy to learn and yet extremely > powerful and can get very complex. But it has just > never really taken off as a mainstream language. > However, I've found a few applications that I would't > write in anything else. Perl? Might as well be writing code in Mandarin Chinese. The multitude of symbols and one character keywords sacrifices legibility for less typing. Perl is not for the faint of heart or the beginner. I for one hate having to keep a whole library of O'Reilly books by my side while I code. A good language should be intuitive and not require a ton of syntax memorization. Python is better, but not by much. > I don't really like Java but it's all the rage today. > And how many times have we all heard that the new > language was going to replace all the other languages? > Sure, it's good for a lot of things but I really > don't think I'd recommend it as a beginner language > any more that I'd make 6-year-olds use a calculator to > learn 1+1=2. I have no use for Java. > For a language that is good and introduces you to a > lot of topics and is easy to start learning and can > get very complex later as you grow you really can't > beat C or C++. C/C++/C# can get a little involved for the beginner. However, it has proven the test of time, and I have to admit I broke my cherry with C. ;-) > BASIC, in all of it's forms, I've found really stinks > IMHO. agreed.

3 2

RE: Good Starter Language? (was Re: REALBasic and OpenAL)
by Garrett Goebel 01 Apr '05

01 Apr '05

How about starting out with understanding the machine? Write Great Code: Understanding the Machine http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1593270038/ product description: > If you've asked someone the secret to writing efficient, > well-written software, the answer that you've probably > gotten is "learn assembly language programming." By > learning assembly language programming, you learn how the > machine really operates and that knowledge will help you > write better high-level language code. A dirty little > secret assembly language programmers rarely admit to, > however, is that what you really need to learn is machine > organization, not assembly language programming. Write > Great Code Vol I, the first in a series from assembly > language expert Randall Hyde, dives right into machine > organization without the extra overhead of learning assembly > language programming at the same time. And since Write Great > Code Vol I concentrates on the machine organization, not > assembly language, the reader will learn in greater depth > those subjects that are language-independent and of concern > to a high level language programmer. Write Great Code Vol I > will help programmers make wiser choices with respect to > programming statements and data types when writing software, > no matter which language they use. except from a review: > This is a most interesting book. It's positioned kind of > halfway between the book on a programming language and the > data book for the CPU. It contains a lot of information > that the computer science classes don't bother to include. > On the whole it is rather machine independent (hard to do > in today's world where the Pentium class machines are so > prevalent), so if you are working on a Power PC or an ARM > chip the material here would still have value. -- Garrett Goebel IS Development Specialist ScriptPro Direct: 913.403.5261 5828 Reeds Road Main: 913.384.1008 Mission, KS 66202 Fax: 913.384.2180 www.scriptpro.com garrett(a)scriptpro.com

1 0

RE: Good Starter Language? (was Re: REALBasic and OpenAL)
by Jeremy Fowler 01 Apr '05

01 Apr '05

assembler... ;-) Learn from the inside out! Seriously though, I would say Delphi and/or Kylix. -----Original Message----- From: kclug-bounces(a)kclug.org [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Leo Mauler Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 1:40 PM To: D. Hageman; Kclug Subject: Good Starter Language? (was Re: REALBasic and OpenAL) If not BASIC, then what would be the programming language of choice for the beginner? Ideas accepted from all. --- "D. Hageman" <dhageman(a)dracken.com> wrote: > > I know a couple of weeks ago I posted a message > recommended a person not learn REALBasic for > their first language. I still believe in this > very much, but we do apparently have a couple > of people on this list that work with REALBasic. . And I always thought: the very simplest words Must be enough. When I say what things are like Everyone's heart must be torn to shreds. That you'll go down if you don't stand up for yourself Surely you see that. -- Bertolt Brecht __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest _______________________________________________ Kclug mailing list Kclug(a)kclug.org http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

KCLUG April 2005