KCLUG

5 participants
3248 discussions

Apache 2.x and mod_rewrite
by Dustin Decker 28 Nov '04

28 Nov '04

Howdy All, I have a quick question on Apache 2.x (2.0.51 to be precise) and mod_rewrite. I've been trolling documentation at apache.org, but their examples are flying over my head. For the purposes of example, let's say I have purchased two domains - foo.com and foo.org. What I want to occur (without leaning on an http-equiv redirect in the browser), is to have anyone who visits www.foo.com <http://www.foo.com/> automagically redirected to www.foo.org <http://www.foo.org/> . Can anyone share with me a recipe for this that I can chew on. (Or even better, considering how lazy I am, just throw up and live with!) Thanks, Dustin Decker

3 3

Firefox taking off!
by Brian Densmore 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

"OneStat.com, an Amsterdam, Netherlands-based provider of Web traffic measurement services, said that according to numbers gleaned from 2 million Web surfers around the world, the Mozilla Foundation's new Firefox releases appear to be cutting into Microsoft's still commanding lead in the browser market. "It seems that people are switching from Microsoft's Internet Explorer to Mozilla's new Firefox browser," Niels Brinkman, OneStat.com co-founder, said in a statement. OneStat's statistics, based on the Web surfers' activity in 100 countries, showed that IE's market share slipped to 88.9 percent in the third week of November, down 5 percentage points from its share in May. Mozilla-based browsers, including Firefox, rose to 7.4 percent, up 5 percentage points from May." Mozilla based browsers with 7.4% of the browser market? Wow, I'll bet Firefox is in M$'s scopes now. I wonder how long before the FUD begins? I'm not sure FUD is going to help them here. I bet they'll be "buying" up one of the third party IE add-on/resellers to get up to speed with Firefox. A new browser war on the horizon? Now would be the time for Mozilla people to approach PC vendors to get Firefox installed on new PCs. Brian Densmore

1 0

Re: RE: Windows Boot Disk
by jmeeks＠kc.rr.com 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

1 0

OT: Windows Boot Disk
by djgoku 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

I'm trying to configure a DOS floppy boot disk (bootdisk.com) with out a ram drive for ghost, and for some reason it isn't detecting the hard drives, just loads the floppy and cdrom support nothing else. My reasoning for this when I boot the disk that does a ram drive in the ghost save menu there is like ram a drive, both cdroms, 3 partitions, and a couple other things that I don't want in there. I do have a boot cd that I'm trying to emulate it which doesn't have a ram drive or lots of drives in the ghost save menu. I'm not totally sure which file autoexec.bat or config.sys loads/searchs for hard drives. Thanks, -- dj_goku -www.djgoku.com- -www.tektronic.org-

2 2

RE: Windows Boot Disk
by Brian Densmore 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

Searching for hds, in dos? That doesn't happen in the autoexec.bat or config.sys, unless it is some strange hd. It happens inside the dos boot programs io.sys or msdos.sys. Loading RAM drives is a different story. To load a RAM drive in DOS it needs to be loaded in the config.sys file, something like this: DEVICE=path\to\RAMDRIVE.SYS size sector entries [/E|/A] HTH, Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: djgoku > > I'm trying to configure a DOS floppy boot disk (bootdisk.com) with out > a ram drive for ghost, and for some reason it isn't detecting the > hard drives, just loads the floppy and cdrom support nothing else. My > reasoning for this when I boot the disk that does a ram drive in the > ghost save menu there is like ram a drive, both cdroms, 3 partitions, > and a couple other things that I don't want in there. I do have a boot > cd that I'm trying to emulate it which doesn't have a ram drive or > lots of drives in the ghost save menu. I'm not totally sure which file > autoexec.bat or config.sys loads/searchs for hard drives. >

1 0

RE: Server Distributions
by Brian Densmore 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

I think this was meant for the list. I should have clarified my statements. I was referring only to the GUI package managers, as was the gist of what Jonathan was saying, I think. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Hull > > Quoting Brian Densmore <DensmoreB(a)ctbsonline.com>: > > > I can attest to this. The only slower than the RPM GUI > > package manager is the gentoo GUI package manager. > > [snip] > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jonathan Hutchins > > > > > > Given that the RPM Database is one of the heaviest loads on > > > most of the RH systems I've run > > [snip] > > I suppose there are many variables such as the number of > packages installed, the > hardware and the patience of the user, but in my experience, RPM has > never produced a noticeable load on any system I've dealt > with. Even in the one > instance that I've had corruption in an RPM database and have > had to rebuild > it, that operation has never caused a noticeable difference in system > performance and didn't take more than a second to finish. > > I've got some relatively slow hardware with a full install of > Red Hat EL WS and > an rpm -qai takes less than two tenths of a second of system > time to complete > and doesn't cause any detectable lag on the box. > > -- > Dave Hull > http://insipid.com >

1 0

PDF pseudo-printing (Debian CUPS)
by Monty J. Harder 23 Nov '04

23 Nov '04

I must be really dense. When I look at the Control Center - Printers in KDE, I see printers listed that include printing PDF to file, but when I try to print something out of, say, Firefox, they don't show up in the list of printers. When I connect to localhost:631 and try to add a printer, I don't see any option to add a printer as print-to-file. What am I missing?

5 10

RE: PDF pseudo-printing (Debian CUPS)
by Brian Densmore 22 Nov '04

22 Nov '04

Setting up CUPS is quite painless. Open up a browser ands go to localhost:631 when asked for a administrator use root. You could also create a special user id/psw just for cups (I've never done this and can't walk you through it). Then just fill in the blanks and choose from choices/dropdowns. If you have printers set up on more than one PC/location then things get more complicated. I have one PC running CUPs in advertising mode, as it has all the printers, and the other PCs point there to find printers for use. You have to tell the CUPs daemon to advertise and what networks can access. For this you'll need to whip out an editor and modify config files and tell CUPS to reread them. CUPS does have a lot of documentation that can be installed locally or read from the web. You'll need to edit the /etc/cups/cupsd.conf file and play with the BrowsePoll, BrowseAllow, BrowseDeny, BrowseProtocols, BrowseRelay, and Browsing directives. http://www.cups.org/sam.html#BrowseAllow For more information. I would also add RTFM, but the TFM is not obvious on where to Fing start, and the TFM documentation structure is Fing confusing enough to disorient even someone as knowledgeable as Bruce Perens. I read a rant he wrote once on this. The CUPs people are clueless when it comes to writing a clear document on use of CUPs. However once it is *properly* configured, maintenance is a breeze. There is also a nice CLI commandset (ie lpadmin), for those that prefer CLI over GUI. Basically the only book you really need to get familiar with is the SAM. After that, PDF printing should just work (YMMV). HTH, Brian D. > -----Original Message----- > From: Monty J. Harder > > > Thanks for the workaround. Now, do you have any idea how I can make > this a real printer that shows up in CUPS? I keep seeing articles > that say that it can be done easily, and then the printer can be > shared via Samba so that Windows machines can do PDFs. But I don't > see HOW it can be done.

1 0

RE: PDF pseudo-printing (Debian CUPS)
by Brian Densmore 22 Nov '04

22 Nov '04

Do tell! How? I've done a workaround by editing the local lpr string to hardcode in a cups printer name. That works for me. Until I update Moz or Firefox. Then I lose both printing and java. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Herrmann > > You can change your print command in Moz from lpr to > kprinter. Then it > will launch the KDE print dialog, and will use the printers you have > setup in the KDE control panel. > >

1 0

Re: ipv6
by Brian Kelsay 22 Nov '04

22 Nov '04

Use ARCNet. You can get the equipment super cheap. ;-) Brian Kelsay >>> Frank Wiles <frank(a)wiles.org> 11/19/04 03:18PM >>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:13:53 -0600 David Nicol <davidnicol(a)gmail.com> wrote: > how about IPX? or DECnet? And how about on a VPN? Ok I'm confused. How does IPv6 pertain to these? And no offense, who still uses IPX and DECnet?

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

KCLUG