Ok folks- i move to squash this *RIGHT NOW*
The best phrasing we could use? Declaring "stupidly antagonistic" cruft as not in anyone's best interest. And further- originating that sort of thing is acting against the best interests of Linux and Open Source as a whole... As is letting it go beyond perhaps the seconding of a motion to take it OFF LIST!!
IF that is too complex? Two simple words. Grow up!
I do not say this lightly. WE are judged by our posts. Linux is judged potentially by US being what people associate with Linux. How then do you wish KCLUG to be thought of? As a list of scholarly discourse? Or petty displays of frank stupidity.
Think before posting!
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Jeffrey Watts [email protected] wrote:
I like how you CC the mailing list on a personal argument so you can try and get support from the peanut gallery. When you were a kid did you run to the teacher every time you didn't get your way?
J.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:28 AM, Leo Mauler [email protected] wrote:
Rather disingenuous to claim that you never intended for people not to be informed when you wrote a huge E-mail to me saying it would be a terrible idea for me to inform people about Linux running on older hardware, and reiterated your "stop it" command within the same message where you tried to claim you didn't want to prevent my message about Linux running on older hardware.
--
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself." -- Thomas Paine
Kclug mailing list [email protected] http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug