On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Leo Mauler [email protected] wrote:
I agree as well about KCLUG organization, though piling all "administrative duties" on one person may be going a little too far too fast.
For example, Christopher Bier has been doing a fantastic job representing KCLUG with ITEC, but I suspect he wouldn't want to take on the Supreme OverPenguin job and have to do everything else as well.
I see three administrative positions, not just one:
(1) ITEC (and related exhibition conference) representative, for which I nominate Christopher Bier.
(2) Mailing list and website manager.
(3) Physical meeting "chairperson" and local KCLUG event organizer.
Number (3) might even need to have a primary and a secondary, since work and personal schedules sometimes conflict with KCLUG meeting and local small event nights.
This message has been copied onto the message board as well.
Could we consider some degree/s of feedback mechanics, That is meant in this case as letting the administrative person/s know the group's actual majority+consensus. And that's not a redundancy. We can have dissent become destructive or constructive and in MY vision of how it could work- the Administrators working title should properly be "Consensus Director" with implied stress on Consensus as the desire of the group.