On Monday 20 November 2006 10:34, Oren Beck wrote:
Hardly to be considered as flamebait. Consider it as FUD suppressing. Let's get real folks ! We currently have a reactionary and repressive to divergent lifestyles society. Saying otherwise is dishonest. Proceeding from that flat fact?
Actually, we have a society that is *too* tolerant of not just "divergent", but flat out immoral lifestyles. While many people still might know enough to avoid queers, they often tolerate evils such are extramarital affairs (especially pre-marital) and contracepted "marriage". But now this is getting quite off-topic for a LUG...
Again- dare we underestimate how strident a "voice" gets raised if the story is Grody? *I* am the LAST person to advocate censorship of any sort. But care in associations formed seems just simple prudence. The example first coming to mind is a keyword search on KCLUG by a soccer mom. She sees aforementioned link bearing page.-ABSENT a NSFW etc tag. She opens it up-gasps- in attempt to flee she sees the next page's "pincushion" image. She then tells the social circles she lives in that Linux or OSS or whatever keyword She was researching is entertained largely by THAT image. Nice public image eh?
Do you think a "NSFW" tag would make any difference in that situation?