On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:32 AM, David Nicol [email protected] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Billy Crook [email protected] wrote:
There is no question. The LUG needs formal organization. First and foremost, There needs to be an official 'position' of authority, and a fallback person for when the primary is unavailable.
...
I think voting in person at a meeting is the best route. What are your
thoughts?
Once chosen, the leader should be responsible for:
- LUG website - Mailinglist - Planning for LUG growth - Scheduling actual topics, or goals for the LUG - EventsWe could title said person "Den Mother" :)
that said, I've got some half-written infrastructure for holding weighted ranked approval voting operations which is one of my niche business projects for virtual organizations; in case anyone would like to take it over from me and talk about requirements for doing web-based weighted ranked approval voting (wikipedia is a really good resource on approval voting and the various explored configurations and their strengths and weaknesses; including the kind that is used to select, for instance, the secretary general of the UN) please contact me off-list and
-- imagine the possibilities http://www.republicoflakotah.com/faq2.html
Or you could place all the members names/handles on pieces of paper, put them in a hat and throw them up in the air. Whoever sticks to the ceiling is stuck with the job.