On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:52 AM, David Nicol [email protected] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Justin Dugger [email protected] wrote:
The difference is that they occasionally, you know, talk about cycles.
But a massive discussion of the benefits of OTR mudflap size legislation would be equivalently on-topic there
But something more is needed. We need people to present their work. For example, I don't think I've seen you mention Neuros Technologies on the ML yet, even though it's of prime interest to the group. I'm curious, why haven't you mentioned it at all?
Justin Dugger
who are these "you?" So tell us about Neuros Technologies already!
David,
I'm sure you've heard of these things we call "replies". A post is written in response to another poster's message, providing context and an intended audience. In such cases, "you" is directed towards the other poster. This "you" would be Tom Bruno, a Neuros Developer and Manager, and subscriber to KCLUG.
Neuros (http://www.neurostechnology.com/) produces a number of embedded Linux devices. Tom's even promoted a small political cause about DRM, which benefits both Neuros and Linux in general: http://open.neurostechnology.com/content/unlocked-media . The question is, why has he chosen to ignore the KCLUG mailing list, except to egg on mailing list flamewars?
Justin Dugger