KCLUG

9 participants
3252 discussions

MyDoom wave wipes out RoadRunner
by Jonathan Hutchins 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

There was a big wave of MyDoom this morning, and RoadRunner mail servers stopped responding to SMTP (POP still worked). RoadRunner responded by rebooting the servers, but the problem may have been with their routers, or possibly with their DNS (or they may have problems with these services as well). We experienced the same symptom as RR on our Epic Alliance mail server - but only when trying to reach it through RoadRunner - from other sites it responded fine. (Is this off topic? I couldn't decide. RoadRunner used to run Microsoft mail servers. Epic runs some sort of Sun product; I run various servers including Microsoft, RedHat, and Gentoo.)

2 1

RE: gmail initiations
by Allen Darrah 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

1 0

RE: [OT] Assembly and Microcontrollers
by Brian Densmore 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

The only PIC controller kits I've seen are either PIC BASIC or PIC ASSEMBLER. I know it is also possible to do PIC C. I would definitely recommend using the PIC BASIC because there is a lot of pre-written code that can be easily gotten in PIC BASIC. Might want to browse through here: http://www.interaccess.org/aid/links.html and here: http://www.mikrocontroller.net/links.en.htm and here: http://bstamp.sourceforge.net/ and here: http://www.iptel-now.de/HOWTO/PIC/pic.html P.S. - Don't be such a language snob. ;') Use the language that makes the project the easiest to do. > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Bier > > > Charles, Joshua Micah (UMKC-Student) wrote: > | Does anyone know of a good kit out there that would enable > me to hook a > | microcontroller board to me computer via some port and then > transfer a > | program written on my computer over to it. I found a kit from Radio > | Shack that allows it: > <snip /> > > You might want to take a look at the stuff for PIC chips. They seem > pretty common and look like they have a lot of good tools. > > Chris > - --

1 0

RE: Gmail and Opera?
by Brian Densmore 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

All the more reason they should have written it to be W3C compliant ... oh wait ... then it wouldn't work under IE. ;') > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerald Combs > > ... The > more complex and dynamic a web page is, the more difficult it > is to get > things up and running under different browsers. Gmail appears to be > _very_ complex and _very_ dynamic. I don't think their IPO took in > enough money to get Gmail working under IE, Mozilla _and_ Opera. :)

2 1

Gmail and Opera?
by Chris Hoelscher 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

Howdy - I recently took up one of the lug'ers on their kind offer for a Gmail account. Using it right now, as a matter of fact. Uncertain if it will become my email of preference, however. When I try to access from Opera 7.54 (under Win) identifying as MSIE, it barfs on no ActiveX being enabled. When I have it tell sites I'm Mozilla, it "loads" the page, but it is entirely blank. Anyone have a solution to this? Later on, I'll boot into Linux and try Opera there but don't know what more to expect. If I cannot reach Gmail from Opera, I may find that to be a major problem as I am currently enjoying the latest version of Opera (with M2 working in both Win and Linux, with Prefs man-handled to use one common email location from both environments). Thanks - Chris H.

3 2

RE: gmail initiations
by Allen Darrah 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

1 0

[meta] Offtopic posting
by Jason Clinton 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

Offtopic posts are par for the game, of course. But it would be nice if people still put [OT] in the subject so that they landed in my Offtopic folder which I only paruse when I have nothing better to be doing (not very often these days).

4 4

RE: gmail initiations
by Phoenician 08 Sep '04

08 Sep '04

So let me get this straight, because you do not do anything illegal is good enough reason to allow people to collect information and not be concerned about your privacy? Hmm Well if that's the case, would you mind posting you SSN plus your PIN to your bank account? ________________________________ From: kclug-bounces(a)kclug.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Densmore Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 8:58 AM To: Allen Darrah; kclug(a)kclug.org Subject: RE: gmail initiations Dear Mr. Darrah, Expect a visit from our officers from Homeland Security. We are very concerned about your unpatriotic activities and will be watching you closely from our spy satellite with the GPS tracker we installed secretly in your car with our secret court wiretapping and surveillance warrant. Sincerely, The Feds -----Original Message----- From: Allen Darrah I want it. I've never been worried about privacy. Mostly because I don't do anything illegal. Except speeding of course. But I don't send a lot of e-mail about that. Except for this one of course. Al

2 1

Re: Lexmark Remanufactured 12A1980 Cartridge- NIB - FIFO
by Mark Gast 08 Sep '04

08 Sep '04

Hi John, You were the first to respond ... it's yours. E-mail me off list and we can discuss delivery. John Geiger wrote: > Hi Mark > > Is this still available? > > Please let me know. > > Thanks! > > John M Geiger > Instructor > Foss Training Center > (913) 322-7052 > 8700 State Line Road, Ste 200 > Leawood, KS 66206 > www.FossTraining.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: kclug-bounces(a)kclug.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Mark Gast > Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 6:44 PM > To: kclug(a)kclug.org > Subject: Lexmark Remanufactured 12A1980 Cartridge- NIB - FIFO > > Hey Folks, > > I am giving away a Lexmark re-manufactured color ink cartridge (Model > 12A1980 - new in box and a $20 value). I originally bought it for my > 'ol Lexmark Z11 printer. Alas, the printer is no more. The first > person to respond to this missive gets the cartridge. Delivery/Pickup > can be discussed later. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Kclug mailing list > Kclug(a)kclug.org > http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug > > >

1 0

RE: gmail initiations
by Brian Densmore 08 Sep '04

08 Sep '04

> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Taylor > > So home security is delusional too since no house is ever > fully secure? You > lock your door at night, right? To slow down and deter break-ins. > The problem with the security mentality is it's designed around defense. I prefer theft prevention devices. Like roaming robots with stun guns, attack dogs, guns and bullets. The best defense is a strong offense. ;') The challenge is how to effectively do that over the internet. Generally I give information about me that is 10+ years old when signing up for stuff on the net. Or use a pseudonym + old/pseudo information. Of course that's not always possible, but I do what I can.

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

KCLUG